General Guidelines

Professionals and scholars from all English language teaching (ELT) educational contexts worldwide and all related fields and content areas are invited to submit proposals for the ATENK 2020 International Convention & English Language Expo.

Proposal Rating Rubric

When evaluating proposals, reviewers use all six of the criteria in the proposal rating rubric. Abstracts and session descriptions should be clearly and concisely written to convey the session’s significance and its appropriateness to the field and its intended audience. Carefully written and edited, they should demonstrate evidence of a high quality of research and/or practice, as applicable, as well as clear evidence that the session will be well organized and presented.

Factors Disqualifying a Proposal

• ATENK does not receive the proposal by the deadline 
• The proposal is not received electronically via the abstract management system.
• The proposal is incomplete or not completed according to the guidelines in this call for participation.
• The session title, abstract, or description includes the name(s) or institution(s) of organizers or presenters.
• The same or a similar proposal is submitted to more than one strand or session type.
• The presentation promotes commercial interests.